People find out I'm a writer and they tell me about their great ideas and what they'd write if they found the time, the money, etc...
Today, reading John Scalzi's blog www.scalzi.com/whatever (He's the author of Old Man's War - a truly inspired Heinleinesque Sci-Fi novel), I came across this bit of brilliance.
. . . writers don't write because someone dropped a fat wad of cash in front of them, they write because if they didn't they'd go absolutely and completely bongo-striking insane.
Conversely, if I had a million dollars, I would slap it all down on the table in front of any jackass that said they could write a fabulous book if only they had a big fat advance, and tell them they could have every single penny if they could bang out a genuinely salable book in six months (which is about the amount of time writing a book is assumed to take by various publishers I've known). And the reason I would slap down that cash would be that it could not possibly be any more safe than if I tied it up in T-bills, because your basic loudmouth non-writer is no more capable of writing a salable book than I am of piloting a 747, and roughly for the same reason -- it's a skill you have to learn, baby, and one generally learns the writing skill by writing most days of your life (and generally -- alas -- you'll be doing that for little if any pay). The only way a non-writer is likely to produce a genuinely publishable manuscript is if he takes some of the advance money and hires a ghostwriter, but that's not really the same.
Anyway, people who say they can write a book if only they had a fat advance don't bother me; publishers don't go around offering fat advances to random passersby just for a happy chuckle. You generally have to guzzle some famous person's sexual organ first, and most people aren't good looking enough to do that on a regular basis (and those that are have other ways to get their scratch than to pester a publisher). Honestly, the best response to these would-be writers would be to say, "And if someone gave me money for no good reason, I would study the dark ninja ways" with as straight a face as one possibly can. If the non-writer has any brains at all, he'd recognize that you are mocking him and why you are doing it; if not, well, then, I guess you can talk about ninjas. Either way, one shouldn't waste too many brain cycles on it.
www.scalzi.com/whatever/0...ml#comments
Today, reading John Scalzi's blog www.scalzi.com/whatever (He's the author of Old Man's War - a truly inspired Heinleinesque Sci-Fi novel), I came across this bit of brilliance.
. . . writers don't write because someone dropped a fat wad of cash in front of them, they write because if they didn't they'd go absolutely and completely bongo-striking insane.
Conversely, if I had a million dollars, I would slap it all down on the table in front of any jackass that said they could write a fabulous book if only they had a big fat advance, and tell them they could have every single penny if they could bang out a genuinely salable book in six months (which is about the amount of time writing a book is assumed to take by various publishers I've known). And the reason I would slap down that cash would be that it could not possibly be any more safe than if I tied it up in T-bills, because your basic loudmouth non-writer is no more capable of writing a salable book than I am of piloting a 747, and roughly for the same reason -- it's a skill you have to learn, baby, and one generally learns the writing skill by writing most days of your life (and generally -- alas -- you'll be doing that for little if any pay). The only way a non-writer is likely to produce a genuinely publishable manuscript is if he takes some of the advance money and hires a ghostwriter, but that's not really the same.
Anyway, people who say they can write a book if only they had a fat advance don't bother me; publishers don't go around offering fat advances to random passersby just for a happy chuckle. You generally have to guzzle some famous person's sexual organ first, and most people aren't good looking enough to do that on a regular basis (and those that are have other ways to get their scratch than to pester a publisher). Honestly, the best response to these would-be writers would be to say, "And if someone gave me money for no good reason, I would study the dark ninja ways" with as straight a face as one possibly can. If the non-writer has any brains at all, he'd recognize that you are mocking him and why you are doing it; if not, well, then, I guess you can talk about ninjas. Either way, one shouldn't waste too many brain cycles on it.
www.scalzi.com/whatever/0...ml#comments
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Unsu...
Re: John Scalzi on nonWriters and their "only if" laments
Wed, November 30, 2005 - 8:35 AMHey Rick. I could write a book if only I had a really nice fat advance. Slap that million in my direction and I'll take that bet.
-
Re: John Scalzi on nonWriters and their "only if" laments
Thu, December 1, 2005 - 8:38 PMAh shit, I have to learn what I'm doing?
Forget it then. I'm through.
Reminds me of this sign I saw at a co-worker's desk. It said, "Of course my job looks easy. That's because I'M doing it."
:-)
-
Re: John Scalzi on nonWriters and their "only if" laments
Sat, December 3, 2005 - 1:34 PMI love it. Thanks, Rick. :) -
-
Re: John Scalzi on nonWriters and their "only if" laments
Sun, December 4, 2005 - 1:29 PMNot to mention the Amazing Scotswoman, but, er, rich as she is now, JKR really was on the Dole when she wrote the first HP book. And Stephen King was living in a trailer when he wrote Carrie. Um, their millions came *afterwards*?
Folks who say that probably need to be hooked up with the folks who say, "I have a great idea for a book. Why don't you write it, and we'll split the profits?"
Oh, wait. They're the *same* folks, aren't they?
-
